The Dark Ages, the Axeheads and the Torque
"Darkness which could be felt.”
The dark ages were very dark in Rawdon. Like so many other places there is no specific reference to Rawdon before
the Domesday Book of 1086. Without delving too far into pre-history, there have been, however, two finds of specific
interest within the area of the village.
Three flanged bronze axeheads were found under a large stone in 1867 during the excavations for Cragg Royd,
(now a nursing home) Woodlands Drive, Cragg Wood. The date of manufacture may be as far back as 2000 B.C. and
they are now, after some vicissitudes, in the Manor House Museum, Ilkley, though not on display. Does the remark
"found under a large stone” in the earliest report suggest that they may have been deliberately buried as valuable
As for the torque, the first reference1 to it is in the
Rev. Dr. T.D. Whitaker’s2 ‘Leodis in Elmete’ (1816), no less than
36 years after it was said to have been found. He wrote:
"On the lofty ridge of Billing, which yet retains its British name, was found about the year 1780 a valuable
relic of British Antiquity; this was a torque of pure and flexible gold, perfectly plain and consisting of two rods
not quite cylindrical but growing thinner towards the extremities and
twisted together. Its intrinsic value was £18.0.0 sterling. It was claimed by
the Lord of the Manor.”
Slater says that it was found at Intake by a hand loom weaver called Joseph Cooper who for a while used it as
a weight for his loom. This must be based on oral tradition which he took down almost a century after the find.
The Lord of the Manor would be Richard Emmott (as such 1761-1819). Palliser uses the words "claimed as treasure
trove” but treasure trove belongs to the Crown and not to the Lord of the Manor, and his present successor,
Mrs J. Mackellar (née Green-Emmott) tells me that she has no knowledge of it. There is a widely held view in the
village that it is now in the British Museum, where there is certainly a magnificent display of gold torques.
Indeed, a respected headmaster of St. Peter’s School, now deceased, told his pupils year after year that he had
seen it as a young man! However the Museum is most emphatic in denying any knowledge of it.
The Bank of England says that if Whitaker’s statement is correct, that if it was of pure gold, which they doubt,
its value in 1780 of £18.0.0 represented a weight of 249.21 troy ounces and they put the value in December 1997 of
such gold at £965.70. I very much fear that it went into the melting pot.
It is generally agreed today that in prehistoric times valley bottoms were either marsh or dense woodland, the
home of aggressive mammals such as wolf or wild boar, and such settlement as there was would be on higher ground.
If this was so, Rawdon, high but not too high, on a south facing slope and with an adequate water supply would be
a favoured site. What we can be certain of is that life for all who did live in the area would be "solitary, poor,
nasty, brutish and short”. Neither Cartimandua, that Lady Chatterley of the Brigantes, nor the Roman garrison at
Eboracum, the Saxon kings of Elmete nor the Viking chiefs at Jorvik made, or could have made, much difference to
every-day life in Rawdon. Indeed in many ways that did not improve substantially until well into the 19th century.3
However the first gleam of light was the acquisition by about the year 950 of the Manor of Otley by the Archbishop
of York and the building of a church there. What became the ancient Parish of Guiseley was part of Otley parish until
about 1200 but the dedication of Guiseley church to a Saxon saint, Oswald, could indicate at least a preaching cross
there before the Conquest. All ancient parishes in West Yorkshire were huge (Halifax originally contained about 124
square miles) and Guiseley contained what was before 1974 the whole of Guiseley, Yeadon, Rawdon and Horsforth. It
would have been very thinly populated.
1. This may not be strictly true. An archaeological bulletin issued by Cartwright Hall Museum, Bradford in
June 1956 suggested that it was referred to in the ‘York Courant’ of 24th August 1781. Research at York, however,
shows that there was no issue of that paper on 24th August 1781 and it has not been possible to trace it on any
2. Whitaker (1759-1821), educated at Rochdale Grammar School and St. John's College, Cambridge, ordained 1785,
LI.D. 1801. His clerical career was spent in Lancashire but he wrote at length on Yorkshire topography. Some of
his books were illustrated by no less an artist than J.M.W. Turner. It has been said of him that "his style was
elaborate and elegant but his scholarly standards were sometimes compromised”. From 1796 to 1813 he held livings
within easy reach of Emmott Hall, Colne where Richard Emmott also had an estate. From his full description of
the torque, he must have either seen it or a good drawing of it.
3. See Slater’s description of textile workers’ bleak lives in the early 19th century (p.258). Also p. 26
of Cudworth’s ‘Rambles Round Horton’ (1886).